• * LAMC Relaunched *

Forum >> General Chat >> Even though I am not sure what's going on...

Page: [1] [2] [3]

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 01:48pm
	As as i said BULLSHIT.

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 01:48pm
	And*

killer monty [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0	28 Aug 2009 01:48pm
	To Flirts

Flirts Obsession [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 25	28 Aug 2009 01:50pm
	which is in within your rights to think so.. so have more fun slagging me off to the forum to meet your own ends, as im finished commenting..

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 01:52pm
	Thats it run along, im glad a few have seen what you actually meant though Flirt. Theres only a 'few' that would lick your butt from here on fourth, so some good has come out of this.

Scarecrow [inactive] Post Count: 1 Respect: 307

28 Aug 2009 01:56pm

Wow, WL abusing their powers, you do realize that there is a few WL, and I am one and I don't consider my self as a WL b/c I am just a entertainer, but when you say WL in general you are talking about all of us...glad to know my abusing powers are working.................................NOT.....................I do know that if you start a thread and for whatever reason you can have it locked.being that if you were just a player not a WL you would be abusing your powersa..hmmmmm

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 02:02pm
	Mrs B you are such a drama queen, you are making this about yourself? LOL Fuck off.

Scarecrow [inactive] Post Count: 1 Respect: 307	28 Aug 2009 02:08pm
	Whooo I'm a drama queen hmm this in general is about abusing powers which u clearly do when u don't like something b/c u have a strong account u hit ppl.. that's abusing powers, i was responding to a thread that was not urs dear SO BACK THE F** OFF

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 02:10pm
	No sweetie it's not abusing powers, it's called a forum hit on a mafia game. Improper use of authority by someone who has that authority because he or she holds a public office. Abuse of power is different from usurpation of power, which is an exercise of authority that the offender does not actually have. Learn the meanings of things.

Himself [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0

28 Aug 2009 02:14pm

To be fair, strong accounts are meant to hit people, that is the object of the game and is about as relevant to this as a condom is to a nun. Aside from that though, i don't see why this has to drag out much longer. Lines have clearly been drawn and in peoples eyes they have been crossed so lets all just keep it to a line of distrust and hate. The thread itself was pathetic in it's own way. The fact that he never apologised for it would back that up. All he has done is defend the right to lock it which he has but not apologised for what he said. It's not an abuse of powers, it's just Flirts being a dick.

Scarecrow [inactive] Post Count: 1 Respect: 307	28 Aug 2009 02:17pm
	This isn't school time.. I don't need to be in class, I thought this was a game..I responded to a thread about Wl abusing powers..So keep ur lessons to ur self. Ur not my teacher.

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 02:19pm
	Awww well dont use the wrong words with your little posts and you wont need me to teach you things cupcake.

Himself [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0	28 Aug 2009 02:22pm
	If he locked it himself that is an abuse because GM's/FM's i thought were not allowed to regulate their own stuff. Another GM should have been brought in to lock the thread or do what was needed.

[Foo] SunnyBunny [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 2

28 Aug 2009 07:35pm

Not to argue with anyone, i like and respect you as a player poison ivy, but... ...and sorry that it's so long Flirts did apologizes before he locked the thread, well if thats what you think its your choice, sorry if i offended you, wasnt meant like that, and i was just thinking how i would feel if it was say Revco's account and the same thing happened to me.. like i said, wasn't meant to offend and i apologise. and as i made the thread and to stop further comment that might offend by others. i will lock. /locked And since it was flirts thread to start out with, like any other player, he should be able to decide when to lock it. If he should have got another WL to lock it for him is just trivial And for Saint, i never talked to him personally, but viewed him as a respected player by all, it is just a little ironic that the person he sold the account to ended up warring with his old gang

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 07:44pm
	Quote by -Cerberus-: If he locked it himself that is an abuse because GM's/FM's i thought were not allowed to regulate their own stuff. Another GM should have been brought in to lock the thread or do what was needed.

[Foo] SunnyBunny [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 2	28 Aug 2009 07:47pm
	Fair enough, i do not know the rules to a T, he very well might be right.

~~~ [inactive] Post Count: 30 Respect: 599

28 Aug 2009 07:52pm

Quote by -Poison Ivy-: Another GM should have been brought in to lock the thread or do what was needed. Even if Flirts wasn't a GM the thread still would have gotten locked due to the fact that he simply would have asked Lance to lock it (since Lance was online at the time) And as a player it's Flirts's choice when he wants to have his own thread locked. The only difference between him and anyone else that is making or has made a thread, is that he can lock it himself.

[†] CherryRed [inactive] Post Count: 49 Respect: 15	28 Aug 2009 07:54pm
	Which he shouldn't be doing, locking it himself, that is moderating your own work. It's not allowed on mc1, so why is allowed on here? Different rules for the exact same game now?

~~~ [inactive] Post Count: 30 Respect: 599

28 Aug 2009 08:07pm

Quote by -Poison Ivy-: Which he shouldn't be doing, locking it himself, that is moderating your own work. It's not allowed on mc1, so why is allowed on here? Different rules for the exact same game now? You basically just answered you're own question. It's the exact game but it isn't at the same time. Same concept of the game, same creator but it's still a different server/game (also known as game 2 or mc2) MC1 has the 28 day trade/sell rule while fb and here don't. Asking why they don't have the same rules is like asking why MD doesn't have the same rules as MC (any server) when it's basically the same game. There are differences between the 2 games but there is/are differences between the servers as well. And it's really not up to the players to decide how the game should be and what the rules should be. It's up to brad and/or molez to decide what should be included/excluded from each of the servers. Just because we think something should be changed doesn't mean it will be. (referring back to why mc1 can't mod their own threads when they can on mc2) If you don't like that then take it up with brad. If he decides they can't mod their own threads then good, if not then, to bad so sad. Nothing you can do about it.

~~~ [inactive] Post Count: 30 Respect: 599	28 Aug 2009 08:10pm
	........Basically to some up what I just said, it doesn't matter why it's not allowed on MC1 and it is here. But it is! He is allowed ti mod his own thread here on MC2, so let him.