• * LAMC Relaunched *

Forum >> General Chat >> I've Just Realised....

Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Gohan [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 635	26 Oct 2009 09:47am
	Don't you think MafiaCrime would be pretty shitty without non-payers? There would be no need for protecters & the game would be shit boring.. Spread your thoughts

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 09:51am
	Ya, it adds some flavor to the game... but look at it like salt on french fries a pinch of salt will add some flavor, but a cup full of salt will ruin it.

Gohan [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 635	26 Oct 2009 09:53am
	Yeah.. Too many non-payers clearly will overpower the game Too many cooks spoil the broth

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 10:05am
	[youtube]pgPhn4tYxJQ[/youtube]

Gohan [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 635	26 Oct 2009 10:07am
	Lol.

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 10:11am
	Too many bunnies is just as bad a problem as too many non-payers.

black [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0	26 Oct 2009 10:21am
	more bunnys for more non payers... we all win

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 10:22am
	The increase in non-payers causes an increase in bunnies not a decrease, this is for safety in numbers. All non-payers do is cause more bunnies.

Gohan [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 635	26 Oct 2009 10:26am
	Bunnies win over non-payers. Allthough if I was a non-payer I'd think differently

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 10:28am
	[youtube]uK0PxEzk1hI[/youtube] This is how non-payers started

Gohan [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 635	26 Oct 2009 10:38am
	Frankie is damn right!

Murder Bunny - Awesomeness [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0	26 Oct 2009 11:02am
	There are still more payers than non-payers in the game.

[C0N] Drastic [inactive] Post Count: 21 Respect: -32	26 Oct 2009 11:26am
	Quote by Frankiebonesbunnirented: The increase in non-payers causes an increase in bunnies not a decrease, this is for safety in numbers. All non-payers do is cause more bunnies. Care to evolve that "logic" a bit, please?

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 11:49am
	Non-payers think the lower the bunny population by non-paying them. That is wrong logic however. b/c bunny logic is safety in numbers logic, there are so many bunnies here b/c the number of non-payers here is so high that in order to survive as a group need many many bunnies

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	26 Oct 2009 11:50am
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_in_numbers

[C0N] Drastic [inactive] Post Count: 21 Respect: -32

26 Oct 2009 12:43pm

BS Frankie. You think people start a bunny account just so the other bunnies will be safe? The only reason a person goes bunny is to make as many points as possible for themselves, a purely selfish reason and the more bunnies (and non-payers) there are, the fewer points they will make. I'm quite sure not one person here turned bunny just to help others level or ever thought - Oh, there are so many non-payers here, I'd better become a bunny to make the other bunnies safe. lol Your logic fails completely imo.

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446

26 Oct 2009 12:51pm

ok look at it this way, say all the bunnies on this server suddenly disappeared and 0 bunnies were on the server, or instead of hundreds were maybe 10. What the hell would a non-payer do with little or no bunnies? How would you all get your levels, b/c with the exception of very few non-payers like you drastic most don't train stats for shit. You say bunny reasoning is selfish, how is non-payer reasoning "unselfish"? on MC2 most bunnies charge a hit is about 10 points which is half of what an MC1 bunny charges.

[C0N] Drastic [inactive] Post Count: 21 Respect: -32

26 Oct 2009 12:57pm

I don't think non-paying is unselfish, never said such a thing. But the members of Con, or the top members at least, think the whole concept of "Bunnies" is just wrong and it wasn't intended to be a part of the game from the start. So we refuse to take part of it, meaning we look at them as we do any other player - free to hit for exp. If we diminish their population in the process, then that's a good thing too.

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446

26 Oct 2009 12:57pm

[img]http://www.mafiacrime.org/stats-sig/?id=12545[/img] Look at this MC1 bunny, the old TL account, all this on profile: Rentals are 1,500 points a day ONLY 20pts when ever ONLINE/OFFLINE Quote: suicides 35 points each done fast Then compare that with a similar MC2 bunny, me for example [img]http://game2.mafiacrime.org/stats-sig/?id=69[/img] [img]http://i36.tinypic.com/nx6wia.jpg[/img] and I charge 10 pts for a hit or 20 for a suicide Notice how much lower pricing is here relative to MC1?

Samurai [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 0	26 Oct 2009 01:09pm
	Prices are somewhat inflated due to the cap number of DD's also. Plus there are a good amount more people on MC1 than on MC2, that play religiously. I non-pay because it mixes it up.