Forum >> Suggestions >> Traveling Back Cost
Page: [1]
Rating: -1 [+0 -1]
| Tank [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: -1 ![[+]](img/thumb_up.gif "Rate Up") ![[-]](img/thumb_down.gif "Rate Down") | 01 Jan 2012 11:10pm |
When you go to pawnage from london its 350,000$ when you go back to london its 100$, it should be 350,000$ back to london so if you were in a high level city and payed like 500,000$ to go there and you would have to pay the same amount to go back to london,  |
BlackHand![[avatar]](http://images.wildammo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tyson.gif) [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 7 | 02 Jan 2012 02:08am |
 |
| Saints [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 300 | 12 Jan 2012 04:57am |
| First off, fuck no, traveling is expensive already. Second, it's PWNAGE |
| Quit [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 1 | 12 Jan 2012 09:53am |
| Traveling is expensive BUT if one travel between alot of cities, you pay a huge ammount, if one go from lonon to Pwnage its $168,000 and if you go from Pwnage to Chicago its $288,000 - would have been better if between cities is the difference like in this example $120,000 - not that i ever see it will change |
[TET] udk![[avatar]](http://i.imgsafe.org/abb8c5a.gif) [inactive] Post Count: 32 Respect: -2 | 13 Jan 2012 03:26am |
good idea  |
Mad_kash![[avatar]](http://images.mafiacrime.org/i/dmc-dante-side.jpg) [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: -32 | 16 Jan 2012 06:01am |
| I agree. Keep those little bitches from running so much. |
| Quit [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 1 | 17 Jan 2012 06:59am |
it its such a good idea, why not implement it?  |
ll-Ghost-ll![[avatar]](http://mp1st.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BJIJB49CUAEKueF.png) [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 18 | 21 Jan 2012 05:35pm |
| So if this gay shit idea happened in every server we would have to pay ur life earnings to travel to francisco and back San Francisco [bus] [car] $44,160,000 1900 0 |
| Quit [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 1 | 22 Jan 2012 04:16pm |
| that is IF you wanted to travel to London... BUT if you wanted to go to Oslo, it would be +/- 10 mil and not 33 mil. jsut think how much you will be saving during wartimes when the enemy is hiding all over the cities.... you dont go to london each time to go to a new city... you go direct so in theory it should be cheaper to travel between cities |
New player 12![[avatar]](http://i.imgsafe.org/a74cf9d.jpg) [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 1 | 24 Jan 2012 01:10am |
| sorry not a fan of this it would be a good idea if we were to make the game more realistic but i think travelling is already too much |
| Quit [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 1 | 24 Jan 2012 10:20am |
| realistic???? lmao.... lets say you have to drive from your home to work and it cost ya 100 dollars... you arrive there and remember you forgot your favorite pen at home. Now you know you can get one in a suburb nearby but instead of paying now 30 dollers fuel or a few kilo's back, you have to pay now the 100 dollars back home, then the 50 dollars to get to the suburb, and then the 100 dolars agian to get to work... stupid hey???? but this is how the currect traveling works... the suggestion is go direct between areas and pay less in the end - could have cost jsut 160 dollars.... wiht the current system you payed 360 coz you had to go back home again  |
Page: [1]
