MafiaCrime 2 - Forum

* LAMC Relaunched *

.: Home .: Register .: Reset Password .: Chat Room .: TOS .: Forum

Page: [1] [2]

Rating: 0 [+0 -0]

Seriously [inactive] Post Count: 111 Respect: 58	31 Dec 2013 04:04am
	The Score Throw your comments/taunts/predictions ect in here. Keep it friendly chaps.

[710] Mr. Dabbalicious [inactive] Post Count: 26 Respect: 331	31 Dec 2013 05:34am
	Couple thousand to us, couple hundred to them. 2500-400 maybe. ;p

[*69] Southern comfort [inactive] Post Count: 2 Respect: 390	01 Jan 2014 05:31am
	For a shit property I couldn't imagine them really putting up a fight for that

Seriously [inactive] Post Count: 111 Respect: 58	01 Jan 2014 05:33am
	Southern comfort wrote: For a shit property I couldn't imagine them really putting up a fight for that It's a chance for some friendly fire if anything, nothing wrong with a bit of fun and activity.

[BBI] TunaSalmon [inactive] Post Count: 228 Respect: -71	01 Jan 2014 02:21pm
	Picking on a weak gang? Lame..

Seriously [inactive] Post Count: 111 Respect: 58	01 Jan 2014 02:22pm
	There's only 5 people who can kill me. So almost every gang is weak to me. ;P

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	06 Jan 2014 11:52am
	-Assassin- wrote: Picking on a weak gang? Lame.. Shouldn't have a property they can't protect?

[BBI] TunaSalmon [inactive] Post Count: 228 Respect: -71	06 Jan 2014 05:15pm
	Shouldn't exploit power for the sake of doing so, a bit shallow in my eyes. Go take one from a gang whom will put up a fight, not one who will be battered, lined up like sitting ducks

[SRï] Peng Express [inactive] Post Count: 10 Respect: 446	06 Jan 2014 08:21pm
	so if we can't challenge for a business with our new gang what can we do? Seems like everything is frowned upon and everything someone does is 'shallow' or 'not how the game used to be' Maybe this was made to try cause some forum activity and spice

Hodges

[inactive]
Post Count: 4
Respect: 152

06 Jan 2014 09:19pm

Peng Express wrote:

so if we can't challenge for a business with our new gang what can we do?

Seems like everything is frowned upon and everything someone does is 'shallow' or 'not how the game used to be'

Maybe this was made to try cause some forum activity and spice

No, But you've gone for the lowest business ran by the weakest gang. Why don't you look at that business list and go for something that's a little more feisty something with a little fight in it at least. Instead of a Gang that isn't as strong cosisting of a load of bunnys.

Seriously [inactive] Post Count: 111 Respect: 58	06 Jan 2014 10:25pm
	The lowest business? Uhm.. we took the #1 business.

Hodges [inactive] Post Count: 4 Respect: 152	06 Jan 2014 10:40pm
	Mr Buffalo Sir wrote: The lowest business? Uhm.. we took the #1 business. I could only see 1 business owned my MF

[BBI] TunaSalmon

[inactive]
Post Count: 228
Respect: -71

07 Jan 2014 04:27pm

Peng Express wrote:

If you read what i posted, you should already know this. The war in itself wasn't the reason for "frowning upon" the decision to do so, it was the strength of the opposition, whereby you could have picked on a stronger gang for a fairer and even challenge.

Obviously pointing one out for taking the pussy approach hit a nerve :roll:

[710] Mr. Dabbalicious [inactive] Post Count: 26 Respect: 331	07 Jan 2014 04:52pm
	whereby you could have picked on a stronger gang for a fairer and even challenge. Yeah, we could have, but we didn't, we chose to fight for #1. Why would we not take it?

Seriously [inactive] Post Count: 111 Respect: 58	07 Jan 2014 04:58pm
	Veni Vedi Vici Challengers welcome.

[BBI] TunaSalmon [inactive] Post Count: 228 Respect: -71	07 Jan 2014 05:37pm
	Pete wrote: whereby you could have picked on a stronger gang for a fairer and even challenge. Yeah, we could have, but we didn't, we chose to fight for #1. Why would we not take it? Because it's poor character, cheap and fucking lame Need i reiterate a few thousand more times?

[710] Mr. Dabbalicious [inactive] Post Count: 26 Respect: 331	07 Jan 2014 05:39pm
	Who cares? It's there to be warred over, if they can't protect it then they don't deserver it. Do we need to reiterate that a few more thousand times?

[BBI] TunaSalmon [inactive] Post Count: 228 Respect: -71	07 Jan 2014 05:44pm
	#fackingbadass It's just another case of egos growing with their accounts, which, as i've said numerous times before, lame.. So very lame (with reference to the previous post) Stick to your roots and stop being shallow pussies now you've made a stronger account, although it is rather humorous to watch

[710] Mr. Dabbalicious

[inactive]
Post Count: 26
Respect: 331

07 Jan 2014 05:48pm

You're in a streetfight for a few hundred quid. Are you going to A) throw the fight because the other guy is a pussy, or B) win the fight and take the cash?

It's Mafia Crime, not Lets All Be Pussies. What's the point having a good account (in regards to Peng and MBS, not myself) if you're not going to use it?

Using their accounts to play the game and make a little extra cash for the gang, don't see how that's funny at all. But whatever bro, each to their own.

[BBI] TunaSalmon

[inactive]
Post Count: 228
Respect: -71

07 Jan 2014 05:54pm

Pete wrote:

BTW that analogy made no sense, it's a game not real life. Situations are different over the internet, for fat bastards act like buff fuckers, etc

And you do realise you massively contradicted yourself in saying "It's Mafia Crime, not Lets All Be Pussies.", as you took the business from the WEAKEST gang, featuring many low levels and bunnies, where as you could have challenged someone else for a good battle where activity should be required and people working their arses off? (the traditional idea of a MC war, not picking on the weak gang).

And you should also read my comment again. I wasn't saying using their accounts to play the game & make gang cash was the funny thing, I said it was the CHANGE from the quiet to the down right poor acts, represented here, that was the "funny" thing (sarcasm btw)

Page: [1] [2]

You must login to post replies

Mobsters Online | TOS

MC1 | MC2 |