Forum >> General Chat >> Is it me? or............ [Continued]
Page: [1]
Rating: 0 [+1 -1]
[DG] Akeno Bunny![]() [inactive] Post Count: 137 Respect: 2049 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 12:18am |
For some reason the og thread got locked. Since it was the only thing keeping the general chat forum decently active, and there was no proper reasoning as to why it was locked, it shall continue here... So my thoughts... I think the course of action should be similar to what would happen in the real world. In MC = In the real world MC ToS = Law Scammer Tag = Disciplinary Action MC Casino (50/50,slots,etc...) = Business with a Gambling License GM = Law Enforcement attack/mug one or ones friend = taking self action (hope fully within the law) In the real world... Law enforcement can only give disciplinary action, if betting losses are not handed over when conducted with a business with a gambling license. Or if there is a signed (and probably notarized) legal document saying that the two parties promise to honor their word should certain conditions be met. So since law enforcement would not be willing to give disciplinary action it would be up to the individual to take self-action. I'm sure you people see where i'm going here... And don't say that the private message is like a legal document, because it is no different than a casual piece of mail from 1 person to another. Even if I wrote a letter to you and it could be proven that it was in my own handwriting saying I bet _____ if ____. It would not be admissible in court, and would be treated as gambling, which is legally restricted in the US. |
[tHï] Terry Mardy![]() [inactive] Post Count: 169 Respect: 1059 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 01:42am |
Cool story bro |
[DG] Akeno Bunny![]() [inactive] Post Count: 137 Respect: 2049 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 02:23am |
Genesis Bunny wrote:
Cool story bro
ikr!!! I know he doesn't have the scammer tag anymore, but people still need to rant on this topic until the next best thing happens, so the forums don't die. |
Doge [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 43 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 05:27am |
What the fuck did I just read ![]() |
The Dictator [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: 31 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 06:40am |
R3V wrote:
What the fuck did I just read
![]() |
meep![]() [inactive] Post Count: 294 Respect: 0 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 07:23am |
WS Bunny wrote:
Genesis Bunny wrote:
Cool story bro
I know he doesn't have the scammer tag anymore, but people still need to rant. When he reads this he'll come in and piss and moan about why he didn't deserve it and whine about pete giving it too him and all the rest of his whining bitching crap he spills out his mouth. Cunts that dumb he has his own gang mate in his profile ![]() [TCS] Mike Ehrmantraut ward for calling me "cunt".... tsk tsk... has ur parents taught u anything about respect?? |
[DG] Akeno Bunny![]() [inactive] Post Count: 137 Respect: 2049 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 10:35am |
The Dictator wrote:
R3V wrote:
What the fuck did I just read
![]() Just my colorful way of saying how things should be ![]() In MC... GM's can only give scammer tags, if betting losses are not handed over when conducted with a MC Casino. Or if there is a signed (and probably notarized) legal document saying that the two parties promise to honor their word should certain conditions be met. So since GM's would not be willing to give give scammer tags it would be up to the individual to attack/mug one or ones friend. |
[710] Mr. Dabbalicious![]() [inactive] Post Count: 26 Respect: 331 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 03:48pm |
TL;dr |
return of..the tampon![]() [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: -33 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 07:14pm |
![]() a very detailed and concise report there WS - can you do a legal description of what the exact meaning of a stupid twat that has 28 bil to waste on unbeatable stats for a day or so but doesnt keep his word when betting 10k points ![]() |
[DG] Akeno Bunny![]() [inactive] Post Count: 137 Respect: 2049 ![]() ![]() | 19 Jun 2014 11:32pm |
Sure! My description is as follows... And lol the top was my reason for opening the thread, so no need to read it. The rest of it was 5 sentences long, split into 2 paragraphs. If that's to long for you then lmao! |
meep![]() [inactive] Post Count: 294 Respect: 0 ![]() ![]() | 20 Jun 2014 07:42am |
the return of.........Flirts wrote:
![]() a very detailed and concise report there WS - can you do a legal description of what the exact meaning of a stupid twat that has 28 bil to waste on unbeatable stats for a day or so but doesn't keep his word when betting 10k points ![]() I can..A fuckwit ![]() |
return of..the tampon![]() [inactive] Post Count: 0 Respect: -33 ![]() ![]() | 21 Jun 2014 01:56pm |
MR COLD wrote:
the return of.........Flirts wrote:
![]() a very detailed and concise report there WS - can you do a legal description of what the exact meaning of a stupid twat that has 28 bil to waste on unbeatable stats for a day or so but doesn't keep his word when betting 10k points ![]() I can..A fuckwit ![]() Mr Cold - you are on par with WS with your grasp of the english language, concise and to the point ![]() |
Page: [1]